A fairly lame denial, craftily designed to confuse.
Someone needs to pound the hell out of this and see what evidence squirts out.
re: lame denial
Yeah, this doesn’t cut it at all, at least so far as what is reproduced in Politico!!
This is merely what is called a “non-denial denial” as Clintonista watchers will remember so well.
The Obama hack did NOT deny anything specific to conversations in Iraq in July 2008, and possible pressures exerted by Obama (or other back channels), etc. All the flack/hack asserts is a broader point about Obama’s supposed consistency of strategic view. The flack seems very careful not to deny certain specifics.....
There is definitely smoke here..... is there also FIRE?