Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Insight into Candidates through their gifts to charity
American Thinker ^ | 9/14/08 | Ed Lasky

Posted on 09/14/2008 2:09:27 PM PDT by mathprof

American Thinker previously reported on Joe Biden's miserly charitable giving . His campaign released this with an eye to the news cycle:late Friday, at the beginning of a weekend dominated by coverage of Hurricane Ike. We caught the release-did the New York Times?

I had a few minutes to also consider Barack Obama's record:

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama and his wife Michelle gave $10,772 of the $1.2 million they earned from 2000 through 2004 to charities, or less than 1 percent, according to tax returns for those years released today by his campaign.

When he started his run for the Oval office in 2005 he notably boosted his charity giving. Looks better on the campaign trail, especially considering his paltry charitable giving before he was in the public eye. A large chunk went to Trinity United Church of Christ, home of Pastor Jeremiah Wright, Jr.

Then Barack Obama's past caught up with him and his ties to Wright did not look so good, so he left the church.

He also contributed $13,107 to the Congressional Black Caucus (helps to buttress political allies), a contribution he classified as a charitable donation. Note to myself: on April 15th, see if I can have my political contributions to Republican groups classified as donations to charity.

More on Obama:

Sen. Barack Obama released seven years of prior tax return documents on Tuesday. And a review of the records reveals several newsworthy, albeit minor, disclosures.

Obama's family donated a relatively minor amount of its earnings to charity. From 2000 through 2004, the senator and his wife never gave more than $3,500 a year in charitable donations -- about 1 percent of their annual earnings. In 2005, however, that total jumped to $77,315 (4.7 percent of annual earnings), and to $60,307 in 2006 (6.1 percent).

The money went to several organizations. More than $27,000 total was given to Obama's church, Trinity United Church of Christ, whose former pastor Jeremiah Wright has dominated recent news coverage. Other charity gifts included: Muntu Dance Theater, a Chicago-based company that performs contemporary and classic African dance, which received a $5,000 donation; The Rochelle Lee Fund, a literacy organization, which received a $20,000 donation; the Illinois Reading Council, which received a $25,000 donation, and CARE, the poverty fighting organization, which received a total of $31,000 in donations.

Obama also classified a $13,107 contribution to the Congressional Black Caucus as a charity gift.

Paul Caron of the TaxProf Blog had this to say about the Bidens and McCain:

"It is jarring that a couple earning over $200,000 per year would give as little as $2 per week to charity (Editors note:that would be the Bidens). This giving compares very unfavorably to John McCain, whose tax returns show that he gave 27.3%-28.6% of his income to charity in 2006-2007.

I guess for Joe Biden charity begins (and stays) at home.

An axiom: what you hear on the campaign trail from Barack Obama and Joe Biden-compassion for the poor, standing up for the common folk-does not comport well with their own practices and principles.

What about those slumlords that Barack Obama had strong ties to and whom he sent earmarks toward -- the slumlods who left the tenants in rotting apartments? Was that charitable?

Just wondering.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; biden; obama; obamabiden
Revealing.
1 posted on 09/14/2008 2:09:28 PM PDT by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Everyone knows Democrats are only generous with other people’s money.


2 posted on 09/14/2008 2:13:36 PM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Why should they give to charity when the Government is really a charitable organization right? ;)))


3 posted on 09/14/2008 2:13:37 PM PDT by BossLady (Welcome to the new SARAHDIGM!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Sure, they SAY they care about the poor.

All they care about is POWER and getting their friends POWER and MONEY!

So, the poor and naive listen to these poverty and abortion hustlers.

Liberals are all about robbing others and giving to themselves (but pretend they are the Party of Robin Hood).

Barak Obama - the new Sheriff of Nottingham!


4 posted on 09/14/2008 2:16:51 PM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nobama08
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama and his wife Michelle gave $10,772 of the $1.2 million they earned from 2000 through 2004 to charities, or less than 1 percent,

You nailed it, he wants to take away our money, so he can give it away through the government.

5 posted on 09/14/2008 2:19:21 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do it, but we're gonna getcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

What about McCain’s giving before 2006 and any info on the Palins?


6 posted on 09/14/2008 2:22:45 PM PDT by Free Descendant (Palin Power!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Very.

I’ve commented a few times on FR after seeing the details of the returns that were posted online a week or two ago.

Incredibly cheap are the Obamas and Bidens. I know the percentage of charitable contributions given by American taxpayers at the respective AGI levels is higher than these tightwad hypocrites. And you’d think that high profile politicians would know better than to say “no thanks” to charities when their returns will become public record.

Not to mention the CBC and black dance contributions. Or to TUCC.

If I was a journalist or talk show host, I’d make this a major issue. This tells me volumes about the character (lack of) and Christian commitment these cheapskates really have.


7 posted on 09/14/2008 2:22:56 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Descendant
What about McCain’s giving before 2006 and any info on the Palins

I would be surprised if the Palins gave more. They have 5 kids to support. That is a charity in itself.

8 posted on 09/14/2008 2:32:25 PM PDT by Bommer (Who was Obama's diction coach? Bevis or Butthead? Uhhhhhh.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

I’m sure as a Christian, she tithes their income to their church. True Christians should be generous, even if they do have five kids. God always provides when we live by His principles, at least we’ve found that to be true.


9 posted on 09/14/2008 2:39:54 PM PDT by Marysecretary (.GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

I certainly wouldn’t judge either way. I just think we should make hay out of whatever we can make hay out of and want to be sure that we are not in a glass house before I add this issue to my personal pro-mccain stump speech. :)


10 posted on 09/14/2008 4:21:50 PM PDT by Free Descendant (Palin Power!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
We need to take the Robin story back form the liberals by correcting their revision of the moral of the story - Robin hood did not steal from the rich to give to the poor.

Granted, the people were poor, and the sheriff and king were rich, but Robin hood wasn't stealing from all rich people - only the sheriff and the king. The money he stole was (government) TAX collections which he gave back to the people whom the government was taxing into poverty.

In keeping with the original plot of the story - Obama is indeed the sheriff who wants to be the king, so he can tax us even more.
11 posted on 09/14/2008 4:26:40 PM PDT by gatechie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
We need to take the Robin story back form the liberals by correcting their revision of the moral of the story - Robin hood did not steal from the rich to give to the poor.

Granted, the people were poor, and the sheriff and king were rich, but Robin hood wasn't stealing from all rich people - only the sheriff and the king. The money he stole was (government) TAX collections which he gave back to the people whom the government was taxing into poverty.

In keeping with the original plot of the story - Obama is indeed the sheriff who wants to be the king, so he can tax us even more.
12 posted on 09/14/2008 4:29:27 PM PDT by gatechie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
We need to take the Robin story back form the liberals by correcting their revision of the moral of the story - Robin hood did not steal from the rich to give to the poor.

Granted, the people were poor, and the sheriff and king were rich, but Robin hood wasn't stealing from all rich people - only the sheriff and the king. The money he stole was (government) TAX collections which he gave back to the people whom the government was taxing into poverty.

In keeping with the original plot of the story - Obama is indeed the sheriff who wants to be the king, so he can tax us even more.
13 posted on 09/14/2008 4:38:52 PM PDT by gatechie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
We need to take the Robin story back form the liberals by correcting their revision of the moral of the story - Robin hood did not steal from the rich to give to the poor.

Granted, the people were poor, and the sheriff and king were rich, but Robin hood wasn't stealing from all rich people - only the sheriff and the king. The money he stole was TAX collections which he gave back to the people whom the government was taxing into poverty.

In keeping with the original plot of the story - Obama is indeed the Sheriff of Nottingham who wants to be king, so he can tax us even more.
14 posted on 09/14/2008 4:46:19 PM PDT by gatechie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
Insight into Candidates through their gifts to charity
Sorry but this really shallow if not pathetic.

Where is it written you have to list all or any of your charitable donations on your tax returns?

15 posted on 09/14/2008 9:08:03 PM PDT by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
I guess for Joe Biden charity begins (and stays) at home in the taxpayers' pockets.
16 posted on 09/15/2008 9:37:52 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Sarah Palin is NOT worried about anything being above her pay grade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson