Please provide their names and their affiliations. This article contains no sources.
As such, it can't be taken seriously.
>>>> Please provide their names and their affiliations.
Sources burned cease to be sources.
>>>> As such, it can’t be taken seriously.
Then don’t
Please provide their names and their affiliations. This article contains no sources. As such, it can't be taken seriously.
Yo, Chunga, this great piece doesn't pretend or presume to be a piece of reporting. It is a personal, first-person anecdotal opinion piece, and a darned well-done one. As a reader fully aware of this from the first few lines, I went into it buyer-beware, first cousin to your "taken seriously" assumption.
Now had it been a news story, with a byline, in third person, clearly aiming to convey factual info, you'd have a point. Unnamed sources in published news stories should be suspect and may or may not be taken seriously.