Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford
Thanks for the great read.

You really hit it on the head with "The Palin selection means that the McCain ticket screams integrity at the voter. The issue is no longer experience but character."

The public is so jaded AND so overwhelmed with pundits, talking heads, activist anchors (Rather and fake memos) that we no longer trust ANY media, though I believe radio is one some of us distrust less than the others due to its lack of visual pizzazz and distraction. Many may no longer trust our own instincts based on what the tube brings us.

Palin's lifestyle is what makes her different--we don't just HEAR her saying she's this or that--we can see it with our own eyes. She didn't just have a baby--billions do that. She had a baby she had the chance to abort without anyone in the MSM criticizing her.

Whatever we may think of her politics, we can trust OUR OWN FEELINGS AND THOUGHTS about her because they're not based on faith or hope but EVIDENCE. We can SEE evidence of her character.

Similarly, we know McCain's brave wartime experience. It's almost amusing to hear Dems and MSM bitching about how often we hear McCain's story. Well, I knew McCain's story, but hearing Fred Thompson and then McCain detailing it made it seem horrifyingly fresh. Then I looked at Obama, with his servitude to the Democray machine and really, it was an embarassing comparison.

The issue of Obama vs. Palin isn't about experience--it's about which of them we believe is telling us the truth. Obama is on a precipice. Certainly he could still pull this out, but the genius of Giuliani's and Palin's jibes about "community organizing" is that they expose our own conflicts about that "service". When Giuliani made the first crack, I could imagine millions of Americans--who took the "community organizer" label and thought it sounded good, but woondered what IS that, exactly?--suddenly laughing and thinking "Yeah, actually--what IS a community organizer?" And that started the walls crumbling for a lot of people. And there were Palin and McCain to show another way.

I think what McCain did was to APPARENTLY ditch the experience label and take on Obama's CHANGE label for himself. I say "apparently" because all you heard for 24 hours after McCain's choice of Palin was "There goes the experience issue!" But that was the wish of Obama's supporters--in fact, OBAMA started making the case for experience by foolishly going after Palin. He looks so weak, a man who wants to be President going after one of his opponent's foot soldiers. By focusing on her, he validates the importance we've put on her--"If Obama's attacking Palin, he must be afraid of something--you don't see McCain going after Biden."

Obama has completely missed the major value of a campaign. He uses it as proof he can manage (the logic being we should make him president because he's running for president), when it should give daily examples of how he can LEAD. It's a golden opportunity, and he WAS taking it, though I thought in the shallowest possible ways--the fake Presidential Seal, the overseas trip--but instead of rethinking this approach, he's abandoned it, and is now running a primary campaign (where squabbling among a field of candidates is expected, as opposed to the more dignified general election, where one has to show he's a statesman).

The MSM and Obama don't want this to be about character because the whole liberal approach is that "character issues" (can I lead in tough times, am I resolute and honest?) are completely separate from "personal issues" (do I have affairs with interns in the Oval Office, would I get an abortion even though I tell others they can't, even if the baby will be born with Down syndrome?). Obama exploited the personal stuff--that's how he got the nomination, with his "personal story" of being black in America. That's a compelling story, but it's not something most voters can relate to--being brave in a situation ANY voter can be in (as a mother or father) is something ALL of us can relate to.

Obama ran as a celeb, and now he's seeing the magazine covers and the label of "candidate with a compelling personal story" being taken by someone else--he even joked about it on Letterman. The difference is that the "community organizer" balloon has been popped; but Palin's baby is right there in front of us, and isn't going to disappear. There's nothing to find in Palin's past that will alter THAT part of her appeal, and that is a hard wall for Obama to climb.

79 posted on 09/13/2008 2:33:46 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Sarah Palin--the man Biden and Obama wish they could be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377
John McCain has been accused of exploiting his heroic wartime ordeal. The truth is that Obama has been exploiting his race and for a far more devious purpose. McCain tells his story of despair and renewal in his torture chamber to reveal his essential character. He tells us why he wants the presidency and where he wants to take the nation. He reveals the very essence of himself so that we will believe him when he says he will put country above self. Obama exploits his race to mask his soul.

I'm going to ask you to indulge me another post which is really an unfinished vanity but one which I want to set out here because I think it applies what we were saying about Sarah Palin and her moral influence to John McCain and his moral calling:

Understanding John McCain

McCain's Vietnam experience was so shattering that he sees the world through a new lens, the experience so profound that he has emerged from it with a lifelong commitment to country. This gives credibility to McCain's claim that he is a maverick, beholden not to party but to principle and country. This claim to independence is necessary in a political climate in which the present occupant of the White House is found to be unsatisfactory by nearly three out of four Americans. So, the narrative explains why a voter can believe at John McCain is different from ordinary politicians, especially ordinary Republican politicians, and they can't believe he should be trusted to embark on a new course away from current administration policies.

At the end of his acceptance speech, McCain recited how he came to be utterly broken but then restored, even redeemed with a new commitment to service to others when a fellow prisoner urged him by prison telegraph not to quit and die but instead to carry on the fight out of respect for his comrades who even then were carrying on the fight for him.

Psychologists and scholars of religious experience, especially Christian scholars, have long been aware of the empowering release generated by total surrender of the will. One can describe this in psychological language, or in Biblical language, or even in evangelical idiom.

Whatever language one uses to describe these epiphanies there is no question that very often they are real and long lasting. Psychologists would begin to explain the phenomenon by reference to the ego. An Old Testament scholar might think in terms of the first and second Commandments and the muscular faith which follows adherence to them. Christians speak of dying to the self, picking up the cross and following the Savior to become a new man-to be born again. Perhaps the most famous example is recounted in the Book of Acts which tells that Saul of Tarsus was physically knocked off his horse by the Holy Spirit. Saul experiences an epiphany, Saul becomes Paul, and is transformed from a murderous persecutor of Christians to a fully committed martyr who becomes the great evangelist of the early church, indomitable in spirit, inflexible in commitment, and-like the other disciples- utterly fearless. Significantly, Paul, the newbie Christian, does not shrink later from taking on Peter the acknowledged leader of the disciples "to his face" to dispute matters of doctrine.

In contemporary history we have the example of George Bush and his transforming encounter with Reverend Billy Graham. Indeed, we have the Reverend Billy Graham's own epiphany in the forest. We have the numberless examples recited daily in meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous. It is from the success of this group that countless so-called "12 step" groups have been formed to apply successfully the same empowering message of surrender.

The important thing to understand about these epiphanies is that when they are genuine they are often life-long and tremendously empowering. Lives really are transformed forever. Criminals go straight, alcoholics stay sober, and the miserable are made happy. In fact, these newly born spirits enjoy their new condition so much that they seek ways to prolong the joy they have obtained in their moment of sweet release. Almost universally, these people find that service to others is the surest way to prolong that wonderful feeling of well-being.

Isolated, sick, starved and beaten beyond human endurance, John McCain ultimately broke and signed a confession which he mistakenly assumed amounted to a betrayal of his country. Who was this wretched man who lay so anguished in that cell? In his memoir and in his speech, McCain described himself as a kind of a hotshot jet jock, a screwup, a discipline problem in school, and an accomplished accumulator of demerits as a midshipman. Evidently, he was also an enthusiastic swordsman. In short, he was an arrogant SOB. Now, in that cell, he had fallen far. The classic description of the crushing of the ego. At this pivotal moment came the means of his redemption via the prison telegraph: Service to others out of love of country. In his speech McCain declared:

"And I wasn't my own man anymore, I was my country's"

And now we know the rest of the story. This is not to say that John McCain was instantly sanctified in all respects, far from it. He still had to swim his way out of a giant mental, moral and spiritual hangover from his ordeal. His screwing around would cost him his marriage before he could swim to shore. Even today, the old self bursts out in temper. But when one lays this template over the rest of John McCain’s career, one should have little difficulty accepting the story as being essentially true (I for one believe it) and to accept it as a convincing explanation of his career and his conception of his role as president.

Before considering the implications of all of this for conservatives, it is instructive to consider what it means to liberals. [And to compare it to Barak Obama's story]

In a word: "nothing." Liberals do not see it because they cannot see it. They simply do not get it. The whole idea of gaining empowerment through surrendering is as psychologically repugnant to liberals as is the idea of accepting a higher authority in their lives. Consider the Democrat party to be a gigantic creaking contrivance to legitimatize liberals in their insatiable quest to feed their egos. The job of this machine is to provide rationalizations. The obvious examples are sex without consequences and abortion without guilt. These examples demonstrate that the rationalization machine can be quite deadly as it kills 3 to 4 million babies a year. The pernicious doctrines emanating from The Frankfurt School such as moral relativism, feminism, and critical theory find application not just in cultural issues like abortion which kill babies in their tens of millions but across the board, touching all government policy and every aspect of our lives.

To repeat, the whole purpose of this Democrat apparatus is to turn thinking on its head and provide a language to liberals so they can continue to play God (especially with other people's lives). Liberals will never about-face and cast away everything that feeds their ego addictions. That is why we hear them using English words but it comes out as a different language.


80 posted on 09/13/2008 5:01:31 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson