Replies

How can I debate someone on FR who has never been on FR?

You never set up someone on FR for me to debate, “pedigreed” Scientist or otherwise.

‘Not interested in debating a conspiracy theorist, but present the data I will engage it.’ was not backing out, it was setting ground rules. Nothing can be accomplished by sourcing a scientific study to someone who concludes a priori that the scientists are engaged in fraud.

However it is nice to see you admit that your “no response” line was another lie. My last line on the subject was “if you have data present it and I will engage it”; yours, nonsensically, was “put up or shut up”.

However what would I “put up”? I accepted a challenge to debate, I did not agree to arrange to handhold your prechosen Scientist (write a letter to them in Australia, say)to get them signed on to FR or to challenge THEM to a debate.

I accepted the challenge and set the ground rules, you never presented a Scientist for me to debate signed on to FR with a presentation of data to debate.

But if you have had a “pedigreed” Scientist who you want to debate me, and claim that you have expended effort to ‘set up a debate’ I think at a very minimum you might...

a) get them signed on to FR
b) have them challenge me to a debate.

You have done neither.

I however, just as in January and June, stand ready to debate JUST AS SOON as you get a “pedigreed” Scientist signed on to FR to issue me a debate challenge.

But no doubt in six months or so after once again never getting a Scientist on FR to debate me you will once again try to claim I “backed out” of debating.

==How can I debate someone on FR who has never been on FR?

They never came on FR because YOU BACKED OUT OF THE DEBATE.

Just admit you pussed-out and be done with this silly exercise. The more you try to deny the obvious, and the more you falsely accuse me of being a liar, the more I am going to rub your face in the HARD EVIDENCE that you turned-tail and ran.

==However it is nice to see you admit that your “no response” line was another lie. My last line on the subject was “if you have data present it and I will engage it”

I see twisting the facts is your specialty. You had just backed out of the debate with my scientist, and then you tried to get me to agree to “present the data” instead. I then called you on it and demanded you debate my scientists or shut the heck up. You didn't reply. What else was I supposed to conclude? But now here you are pretending that it was me who failed to deliver. You are as delusional as Darwin (which means you have completely lost touch with reality!).