You just keep digging your hole deeper and deeper, Allmendream. A debate on the science is precisely what you were offered (see below). Then you tried to weasel out of the debate by pretending that I wanted you to debate a “conspiracy theorist.” I, of course, called you on it, and then, as is your practice, you fled the scene. Talk about your dispicable behavior!:
Allmendream: I am not interested in debating a conspiracy theorist.
Me: I offered a debate between you and one of the thousands of scientists who officially question the HIV-AIDS hypothesis. The debate was going to be focused on the science of AIDS alone. You accepted the debate and then backed out. Furthermore, I cited paper after paper, written by your fellow evos, every one of which stated that there are indeed codes upon codes. Your issue is with them, not me. And in this connection, I also floated a debate between you and a creation scientist. As per usual, you failed to rise to the challenge. Thus, it is you who are running away, not me...In short, put up or shut up...
Allmendream: NO RESPONSE
Your post #was 162 PS “First you agree to debate, then you back out. Hmmmmm” GGG
In my post #163 posted on Sunday, January 06, 2008 7:35:07 AM by allmendream
If you have data present it and I will engage it.
YOU HAVE YET TO PRESENT YOUR EXPERT FOR DEBATE. Dr. Deusburg Dr. Carter or Dr. Whoever or Dr. Anybody has not signed on to FR to issue me a debate challenge. I did not ever back out. The debate challenge ended with me telling you to present the data you wished me to debate. in post #163 of the thread you claim there was no response to from your post #155 or #162. You are deluding yourself but I doubt your fooling anyone else with your repeated claims that your challenge in post #155 went without answer.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941583/replies?c=162