Once again, saying something is worthless, especially considering your negligible credibility, DEMONSTRATING something is a different kettle of fish.
What evidence do you have that ERV’s will always insert into identical locations in similar species, and then hyper-mutate to the exact difference one would expect based upon its likely incorporation time into a common ancestor?
If retroviral insertion was predictable then gene therapy wouldn't be so much of a problem.
You have no answer for why a bacteria would increase its mutation rate in response to stress.
You have no answer for how ERV’s show up in nested hierarchies.
You have no answer for why any animal would have pseudogenes at all, let alone why similar species would have identical disabling mutations in the same pseudogene.
You have no answer for how epigenetics somehow makes animals immune to DNA changes.
You have no answer for how these epigenetic markers are not themselves subject to mutation and selection (such as in lactose persistence).
Maybe you should spend more time learning the subject and less time giving yourself delusional congratulatory pats on the back.
==I admit that you are a total novice, but shown up?
Actually, you got so tired of being shown up that you once accused me of being one of the science writers over at Creation-Evolution Headlines. What a laugh!
And there’s a reason why it’s relatively easy for creationist laymen to defeat the arguments issued by the high priests (or in your case, the low priests) of Darwinism—WE HAVE THE TRUTH ON OUR SIDE.
I will look into your into your new batch of evo-challenges when I find some spare time.
Have a great weekend—GGG