It is well known that some DNA sequences are more subject to change than others.
For example the active domain of hemoglobin is highly conserved between species. Almost any change in that active domain will impair the proteins ability to properly bind oxygen and is thus a fatally deleterious mutation, thus any mutation in that region does not persist in the population. As a result almost every species of red blooded animal has the same Amino Acid sequence for this region (although not always the same DNA sequence to code for it, the code being redundant).
So if a bacteria increases its mutation rate while under stress in order to survive, WHAT IS IT ABOUT AN INCREASED MUTATION RATE that would confer a survival advantage?
According to the creationist paradigm ANY mutation is a deviation from the eternal and immortal and perfect being that the organism was created to be, and a symptom of our fallen universe. Why would deviating even more from the sequence it was created with confer a survival advantage?
Actually, you are scraping the bottom of the barrel with this misrepresentation.
I suppose that's why you didn't quote me back, but cut out what I did say. I didn't say you didn't understand that genetic variation is constrained, now did I?
Here's what I said, "Evolutionists ignore the fact that genetic variation (and mutation) is constrained. Mostly because they don't understand the implications."
Now, did I say that you didn't understand that genetic variation is constrained? Is that what I said? What did I say? It's quite clear to someone who can read and think clearly. Try real hard to comprehend and repeat it back.
If you don't have a point without misrepresenting what people say, perhaps it would be better not to say anything at all.