==So it’s OK for an evo to put the explanation for how we got here in lay people’s terms, even when he knows is inadepuate, but if God puts it in lay people’s terms in the Bible, then it can be mocked and derided for *scientific inaccuracy*, and stated that it’s wrong.
Excellent point. But there is a big difference. The Evos are holding back what the book of nature says about their so-called “theory” because it undermines their Darwinian faith.
Exactly. As you astutely point out in another post, Darwinism has already been dead for a while. However, the corruption in Big Science continues to push their agenda to new levels, in spite of the simple logic put forth by prominent creationists that we should be doing otherwise.
Not even basic physics is safe now. The Darwinist establishment has poured $9 billion into a big machine in Europe in order to find what they blasphemously call the "God particle" in what stands to be the ultimate derision of Judeo-Christian faith from the scientific establishment.
Of course, none of the raw data will printed for the general public, because they fear the competition that Creation Science and other competing theories will give their data. They'll, of course interpret their own data, instead of allowing thinkers on sites like FreeRepublic (and other conservative websites) to interpret the raw data without the 'proper Darwinist bias'. Count on hearing reports that they've found 'the God particle', without dissemination of the raw data (undoubtedly a house cards) to the public.
It doesn't take a genius to realize that the people who set out to do the experiment are the last people who should be interpreting the data. $9 billion, lots of it American money, dumped into this useless project in Europe - that's how bad it's gotten. If only creation science could have $9 billion in funding - imagine the discoveries that would be made.