To: CommieCutter; GodGunsGuts
Dawkins was Gibsonized. Do you really think someone who has made a career of addressing questions about evolution—even if you think he’s wrong—wouldn’t be able to answer a questions that a half-dozen posters on this board have answered over and over?
To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
Gibsonized, my foot. You're just going to have to face the fact that evolution's leading apologist couldn't think of a single example of a genetic mutation or evolutionary process that has lead to an increase of genetic information in the genome. That's the reason why Dawkins suddenly froze and looked like he was having some sort of seizure. Notice that when he finally recovered enough to start moving his mouth again, he still couldn't answer the question, and instead began babbling on about fishes and reptiles and various other gobbledygook that had nothing to do with the question.
To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
He didn’t even answer the question at all! He went into some explanation about evolution “misconceptions”.
1,656 posted on
09/22/2008 4:27:26 AM PDT by
CommieCutter
(THE BIAS OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA HAS FINALLY HIT THE MAINSTREAM!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson