Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BibChr
I agree that the "Torricelli Option" is always on the table for Dems, but I am beginning to think that Hillary has no interest in being the secondo to a sinking ship. She is better poised to let Obama go down and be the party savior in '12. So who does he pick? Granholm? Pathetic. Plus the McCain ads write themselves.

On the religious front, I am pretty sure that the campaign doesn't want to go there, because of Jeremiah, the bullfrog.

Time will tell, of course, but I agree that this campaign appears to be doing a good job and I am willing to let them go with it (rather than calling me for my brilliant advice!)

3 posted on 09/11/2008 4:52:05 AM PDT by ajwharton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ajwharton

I agree. I don’t think Hillary wants anything really to do with the Obamanation. She’s looking at 2012.


8 posted on 09/11/2008 5:11:44 AM PDT by SumProVita ("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ajwharton
So who does he pick? Granholm?

Couldn't if he wanted to. She was born in Canada.
9 posted on 09/11/2008 5:13:37 AM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson