Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ExtremeUnction
They did not plan for the large number people who went to court over the ticket. As a result, police departments and courthouses were hit with staffing pressures that were needed to handle the increase in court cases, including the processing of evidence, etc..

That's kind of hard to believe if these are the type of cameras that take a perfectly clear photo of the driver behind the wheel along with laser or radar speed measurement. I mean, you can show up in traffic court in Washington requesting a mitigation of the fine, but what kind of a contested defense would one muster to the violation? (other than the usual calibration issues, but the WSP has been extremely fastidious about procedures recently). It is true that the prosecutor's office (usually the county-District Court here) has to devote staff time to filling requests for discovery.

28 posted on 09/09/2008 4:15:36 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: steve86
I mean, you can show up in traffic court in Washington requesting a mitigation of the fine, but what kind of a contested defense would one muster to the violation?

I can think of a few things, all involving cameras. A branch over the speed limit sign the most odvious...leaves deflecting the radar beam...some other reason it points in the wrong direction...All bs and some of it contrived, but still it requires resources to prove against and what's to lose? A little time? I'ld give it up along with a slightly higher fine just to be a pain.

30 posted on 09/09/2008 4:24:33 PM PDT by Dosa26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson