Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The WaPo Swings and Misses (Again) Against Palin
American Thinker ^ | 9/9/08 | Pat Casey

Posted on 09/09/2008 10:22:47 AM PDT by pissant

The attacks on John McCain's Vice-Presidential running mate Sarah Palin are starting to get sillier and sillier, with major media outlets now leading with inflammatory and accusatory front-page headlines with little, if any, substantiation for the headlines within the associated articles. This is certainly not going to help the media defend against the growing public awareness that the press is biased against Palin and John McCain.

This morning's example? A front page article in the Washington Post, Palin Billed State for Nights Spent at Home, with the subtitle "Taxpayers Also Funded Family's Travel". An image of the front page of today's Post can be viewed here.

Oh oh, this is it! The Washington Post's intrepid reporters, James V. Grimaldi and Karl Vick, have finally gotten past the invented scandals that the DailyKos was feeding the media, and found evidence of fraud and malfeasance. Perhaps even an impeachable offense! Wow. Those silly Republicans. Nominating such a criminal as Sarah Palin to help run against the Anointed One. Well, they're finally going to get their comeuppance.

The article starts off thrillingly enough, and seems to ensure that big revelations are just around the corner:

ANCHORAGE, Sept. 8 - Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has billed taxpayers for 312 nights spent in her own home during her first 19 months in office, charging a "per diem" allowance intended to cover meals and incidental expenses while traveling on state business.

The governor also has charged the state for travel expenses to take her children on official out-of-town missions. And her husband, Todd, has billed the state for expenses and a daily allowance for trips he makes on official business for his wife.

Promising, promising... And as editors at the Washington Post know that average Democrats have only the attention span of a few paragraphs, here come the blockbusting revelations:

Palin, who earns $125,000 a year, claimed and received $16,951 as her allowance, which officials say was permitted because her official "duty station" is Juneau, according to an analysis of her travel documents by The Washington Post.

The governor's daughters and husband charged the state $43,490 to travel, and many of the trips were between their house in Wasilla and Juneau, the capital city 600 miles away, the documents show.

Hold it. State officials say that such an arrangement is allowed under state law? Where's the scandal that supports the headlines? The article goes on:

Gubernatorial spokeswoman Sharon Leighow said Monday that Palin's expenses are not unusual and that, under state policy, the first family could have claimed per diem expenses for each child taken on official business but has not done so.

..."As a matter of protocol, the governor and the first family are expected to attend community events across the state," she said. "It's absolutely reasonable that the first family participates in community events."

The state finance director, Kim Garnero, said Alaska law exempts the governor's office from elaborate travel regulations. Said Leighow: "The governor is entitled to a per diem, and she claims it."

...Leighow noted that under state policy, all of the governor's children are entitled to per diem expenses, even her infant son. "The first family declined the per diem [for] the children," Leighow said. "The amount that they had declined was $4,461, as of August 5."

The family also charged for flights around the state, including trips to Alaska events such as the start of the Iditarod dog-sled race and the Iron Dog snowmobile race, a contest that Todd Palin won.

Oh dear. No scandal. And certainly nothing that warranted that particular headline and lede of a front-page article in one of the last remaining respectable major national newspapers.

This seems to be a story that some editor at the Washington Post wanted to run with that particular headline, regardless of the direction that the facts took it. I hate to break it to the newspaper, but Alaska is half the size of the continental United States. Sometimes, visiting your next-door neighbor is the equivalent of taking a trip from Boston to Washington - and that's expensive. As the article also tells us, many times the invitations extended to Governor Palin by groups and organizations across the state (let alone across the country) specifically requested the presence of her family - a fact which makes Palin's husband and children eligible for reimbursement.

As for the per diem, when your home is 600 miles away and you conduct official business from it, even if it's just a staging area, reimbursement is appropriate. Unlike Senators such as Barack Obama and Joe Biden, a Governor is on-the-job 24 hours a day. Arguably, especially considering the distance, it would not be out of bounds if the state provided a separate budget for running a satellite Governor's office out of her home. If anyone in Alaska doesn't like these arrangements, they can change the applicable state law, which have been in place since long before Palin became Governor. Just because someone at the Washington Post doesn't like it, doesn't mean that it's illegal - or even wrong.

Exciting times! We're watching as whatever's left of the drive-by-media's credibility slowly ebbs away....


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: mccainpalin; palin; pds; washingtoncompost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Keep the BS attacks up fellers.
1 posted on 09/09/2008 10:22:47 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant
Baberaham Lincoln is made of teflon now. All this nonsense is rebounding back on her lib attackers.

I think that the lib media are suffering a major case of reader/voter fatigue. No one believes them any more.

2 posted on 09/09/2008 10:30:39 AM PDT by Nachum (Sarah Palin: Baberaham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I don’t know the answer to this but I wonder if Senators - who have residences in Washington as well as their home states - get per diems at one or the other. Or both. Just wondering.


3 posted on 09/09/2008 10:32:53 AM PDT by jim macomber (Author: "Bargained for Exchange", "Art & Part", "A Grave Breach" http://www.jamesmacomber.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
LOL!

Yesterday it was the "Palin wanted to censor the library" story ... the hideous headline of which also was contradicted by the article.

It'd be funny, were it not so damaging to civil discourse.

4 posted on 09/09/2008 10:33:26 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The junkies at the WarshPost would undoubtedly like for Sarahcuda to abandon her baby Trig among their pet polar bears up on the North Slope.

They are really angry this time ever since it was discovered her mother was never Jewish, not even during WWII.

Don Graham's head will undoubtedly explode this time..

5 posted on 09/09/2008 10:34:38 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Someone told me that Biden commutes to Washington every day. I wonder what his expenses look like?


6 posted on 09/09/2008 10:39:06 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Check out The Corner on National Review for more about this one. Jonah posted an email from me with a link to the Alaska Admin Regs on per diems showing that she followed the policy.


7 posted on 09/09/2008 10:39:23 AM PDT by Julliardsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jim macomber
Federal per diem rules require you to establish a primary domicile ~ this concept appears under different names in different portions of the travel manual, but the idea is you must decide where you work. I always used Washington DC. Presumably members of Congress do the same.

Travel for the purpose of commuting to work is not reimbursible. I'd guess Joe Biden does not get reimbursed ~ or maybe he does. Someone should find out.

BTW, Congress has its own rules ~ it's a separate branch of government and no one there needs to follow the Executive Branch travel rules ~ although, in general, whatever Congress does in this regard will look pretty much like what everybody else does.

8 posted on 09/09/2008 10:42:21 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant
This story was on the front page of our local paper this morning. When you read it you realize there is nothing to the story and it is an obvious heat piece. It is so obvious the MSM and their liberal buddies will do anything to destroy this woman. This is just the beginning. It is going to get much worse. They are truly scared.
9 posted on 09/09/2008 10:42:27 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Julliardsux

Keep on swingin! Let’s get it all out of the way so by the home stretch, the only thing they’ll be able to throw at her is her 70’s hairdo. The Left is Toast.


10 posted on 09/09/2008 10:43:03 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: r9etb; pissant

Well, yes, but the real point is that Obama voters only read the headline, and maybe the first paragraph. After that, their mind is made up, and they turn the page.

That is why they see the ‘facts’ differently than we do.

We actually read the whole thing.


11 posted on 09/09/2008 10:46:02 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The strange thing is that on the same day they ran an editorial crediting her for negotiating the new gas pipeline. It seems like the WSJ, where newsroom and editorial board maintain distance. I often can read the WP editorials, but seldom the NYT.


12 posted on 09/09/2008 10:46:48 AM PDT by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

OK. the first two paragraphs.

They skip the rest of the article, because it contains details which brings up things like facts, and proof, which is stupid stuff that only members of the VRWC care about, or believe.


13 posted on 09/09/2008 10:49:28 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The problem is, as the main stream media reports this bunk often enough, it becomes the “truth” in the mind of the public.


14 posted on 09/09/2008 10:51:29 AM PDT by llevrok (Drink your beer, damn it. There are people in Africa sober!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

They were far worse on Reagan, and Reagan did not have FreeRepublic and Rush Limbaugh and the blogosphere to set the record straight.


15 posted on 09/09/2008 10:54:04 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The state finance director, Kim Garnero, said Alaska law exempts the governor's office from elaborate travel regulations. Said Leighow: "The governor is entitled to a per diem, and she claims it."

Story over!

16 posted on 09/09/2008 10:55:08 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Well, yes, but the real point is that Obama voters only read the headline, and maybe the first paragraph. After that, their mind is made up, and they turn the page.

Precisely ... and as a result the WaPo and the rest of the MSM are doing tremendous damage to civil discourse in the US.

17 posted on 09/09/2008 10:57:31 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

If they had moved the state capital to Talkeetna, as there was talk of doing years ago, then she would have a short commute and wouldn’t have to keep flying to Juneau.


18 posted on 09/09/2008 11:09:02 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Comprehending a state as large as Ak.,,,or W.Va is over the posts’ pay grade. Stick a sock in it wapo.


19 posted on 09/09/2008 11:11:23 AM PDT by Waco ( G00d bye 0'bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Shhhhhhhh, don’t say anything, but if the media really wants to help Obama win, they are going to have to go back to their old playbook and cover his every move 24/7 with a multitude of reporters and cameras like they did on his trip to Europe. They need to recapture that rock star image that he is loosing. But thankfully instead they have been distracted by Governor Palin and are fully focused on looking for loose threads in her tapestry, digging for anything in her past or present they can use against her, and while they are looking away from Obama, his rock star image fades into nothingness quicker than Milli Vanilli.


20 posted on 09/09/2008 11:19:54 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson