Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shocking footage that could prove 90 Afghans - not seven - died in U.S. airstrike (lots of pics)
Daily Mail.uk ^ | 08th September 2008 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on 09/09/2008 9:48:09 AM PDT by yankeedame

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: yankeedame
This will be proved a hoax, just like all the other wedding parties.........."SNARK@@##**"

I just love it when CNN and MSNBC grab this stuff and put it out as hard news. Every time they do, they step in the crap and never clean their shoes.

41 posted on 09/09/2008 10:59:20 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Well....................................That's .....that.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

There are at least three plausible explanations for these bodies.

1. High-level Taliban were hiding among a bunch of women and children. That happens all the time.

2. The Taliban shot these people themselves, and then blamed it on us. That happens, too.

3. The whole thing is a fake, with terrorists for photographers and terrorists for lying witnesses. That has happened often. In fact more than one AP photographer was actually a terrorist working for the organization as a stringer.

I didn’t hear any complaints when clinton ordered civilian targets to be bombed deliberately. I hope the airforce people who participated in the attack were not aware of what the targets they were ordered to hit actually were, but certainly clinton and his stooges knew all about it when they ordered attacks on such targets as the Belgrade TV station.

That sort of DELIBERATE atrocity has never happened under Bush, that I am aware of. It happened several times, at least, under clinton, who ordered some pretty indiscriminate bombing from high altitudes.


42 posted on 09/09/2008 11:03:10 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA

The articles tracked with the keywords mediawar and fauxtography have done a lot of damage to their agitprop campaign.

The boy who cries wolf 1,000 times will have a hard time claiming victim status if/when there is a genuine attrocity.

“Maybe the Afghanis and Iraqis saw the precision bombing of the US forces and presumed they could safely stand next to the bad boys.”

More likely they don’t even see the Taliban and AQ in their midst as “bad boys”.


43 posted on 09/09/2008 11:04:46 AM PDT by weegee (Better to support a pitbull in lipstick than to be in a party that is putting lipstick on a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Camel Joe

Sadly the folks at DU dont believe the US or Fox News

Im so surprised


44 posted on 09/09/2008 11:06:30 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Remember when the Chinese embassy got hit in the Clinton era? Talk about a major blunder. It went down the memory hole.


45 posted on 09/09/2008 11:06:59 AM PDT by weegee (Better to support a pitbull in lipstick than to be in a party that is putting lipstick on a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
These people are barely out of the stone age but someone has a modern cell phone and charger?

What proof is there of
*bodies, not just blankets?
*Date of photos?
*the actual location of the photos?

Who took the photos? The "angry Afghani woman" has an AP mark in the lower left.

What nonsens, the enemy hides among civilians, sometimes as the "honored guest" of the civilians, and we're supposed to feel bad about situations like this (if they actually occurred)?

Civilians get the short end of the stick in most wars, when they are in a war that features one side fighting in civvies, without any regard for "collateral damage" these things happen, sometimes that's the plan.

This is an EVIL enemy.

46 posted on 09/09/2008 11:07:39 AM PDT by Former Dodger ( "Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." --Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

Surely they wouldn’t splice in the “alien autopsy” footage to make their claims. < /s >


47 posted on 09/09/2008 11:08:34 AM PDT by weegee (Better to support a pitbull in lipstick than to be in a party that is putting lipstick on a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pete98

Can we tell from the pictures that those are even real, live bodies? Everything I see is blurred and not well exposed.


48 posted on 09/09/2008 11:59:53 AM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Did somebody say, "Paliwood needs me again?"


49 posted on 09/09/2008 12:57:37 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson