Anything short of approval of the legalized murder of live birth babies is considered to be an "extreme anti-abortion stand" by the baby killers.
her belief that creationism should be taught in schools alongside evolution.
Evolutionists consider anything less than a fervent, unbending commitment to the atheistic religion of evolution totally apart from any hint of intelligent design or any process other than Darwinian natural selection to be rank heresy punishable by banishment from academia. OTOH, many, if not most, proponents of intelligent design theory are willing to allow their beliefs to be examined, debated, and compared in the classroom to evolutionist theory.
The evos' refusal to allow students to even hear anything favorable to intelligent design epitomizes the ersatz version of academic freedom that Darwinists claim somehow trumps true academic freedom, and in some manner known only to them gives them the right to allow only one unproven and unprovable theory, theirs of course, to be presented as proven, incontrovertible fact to young skulls full of mush in government schools.
Agree. Allowing any form of killing children is extreme.
I read this article, and I"m still trying to recover my IQ level. This woman took maternity leave, so she has at least one child. To look at your own flesh and blood, look at a baby newly born, and still be able to support Roe V Wade is extreme beyond my comprehension.