OK, on the baby, the story appears to have been knocked down by one of Palin’s own enemies from Alaska. I still don’t know what the hell this is about. The e-mail is genuine and speaks to the baby. The woman obviously dislikes Palin and admits to as much since 1996. Obviously there are issues between the two.
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_anne_kilkenny_on_palin.htm
Having said this, there is something that could be a problem and I’m trying to run it down. That pertains to the librarian business. But the NYT is not doing that story. ??????
Maybe THAT’s the deal..she kept her pregnancy secret for 7 months ( according to the link you post form the “enemy” of Palin)
Maybe the NYT will have medical experts say she impacted Trig’s well being in utero.. ( although chromosome wise, he would be already configured in the first trimester I think..)
But really, i feel they will try to say she has been negligent..either while pregnant, or now.
Sounds to me like Wasilla had at least one “community organizer.” Whines and gripes at city council meetings and puts on “student voting programs.”
she has said in one of her videos being interviewed by somebody well before the vp stuff that the best advice she ever got was to "not try to please everyone".....
sick of this crap...people....
I'd like to see that Larry Sinclair story up there in the NYT.....
we've got to fight this....
send more money...write letters to the editor....attend rallies....
we must get McCain and Palin in the White house.
What a crock! It sounds like a typical democrat twisting the facts.