Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: airedale

Few realize it, but that HIPAA privacy law started out as HillaryCare. It’s all she could get through. It would be a very appropriate club to use on the Slimes.


320 posted on 09/07/2008 5:00:15 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]


To: JohnBovenmyer
HIPAA violation would not be against the New York Times. It can only be used against the medical provider, or someone that has the medical information for business purposes and divulges to someone else without a need to know. Rumors, or second hand accounts are not HIPAA violations.

For example, I work in medical billing. If during the course of my work I find out you have an STD, and I tell your wife, without permission, that is a HIPAA violation. But if I see you if a grocery store, and you tell me that you have an STD, and I turn around and tell your wife, that is not a violation, that is just gossip.

So in this case, the NYT would not be in violation, but whoever told them could be if they originally got the information from medical records.

437 posted on 09/07/2008 5:20:19 PM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson