The expose will probably be about getting on a long flight to Alaska after her water broke in Dallas. She was fortunate that nothing went wrong and the baby wasn’t born on the plane.
I think the Times will insinuate that Todd Palin is not Trig’s father by stating that nine months before Trig’s birth, he was working on the North Slope while Sarah was in Juneau.
Baby to NYT: Barf!
I think the editor needs to have a little talk with Megyn Kelly.
For what? What is the plan of attack? The 17 year old has a baby of her own, are they saying the dad was someone else?
All the Palin smears you ever heard of... and then some
09/07/2008 2:05:13 PM PDT · by andrewmin · 16 replies · 1,247+ viewsExplorations ^ | 9/6/08 | Charlie Martin
They are fronting for McCain now?
Between calling everyone who doesn’t vote for Bambi racists and now, bringing up Palin’s baby, they appear to be doing everything they can to tick people off.
Which Palin baby? Either way it will blow up in their face.
I can’t blame the Al Qaeda Times for attacking Trig Palin on behalf of Hussein. Trig Palin, outside of not being old enough to be legally serve, is still far more qualified than Hussein to be President.
That wording sure is baffling, isn’t it? “Prepares to front expose”?
Even if the word should be “exposé” rather than “expose”...that still seems odd.
They should discuss this with US Magazine first so they have a heads up of the backlash. They won’t, but they should. Bring it on MSM, you too can experience an expose’ of your own.
Trig horribly embarrassed by Palin’s palm lick hair style. Sues for divorce. Begs the Obamas to adopt him.
I’m beginning to think the NY Times is trying to sabotage Obama. Surely they are not this stupid.
Let me guess...now they are going to say Bristol’s baby is really Sarah’s. Since the other way didn’t work out.
A theory, and it may be wrong: They’re going to argue that she was pregnant with her first child when she got married. Of course that depends on arguing that the child was carried to full term and thus the 8 1/2 month gap or whatever it was is proof that she was impregnated just before she eloped.
Just guessing. But if they think that’s an expose, wow. Nancy Davis was something like three months into her pregnancy when she married Ronald Reagan and nobody cared.
NYT loading up the lyrics for the Karaoke Media Machine again!
Figures. I said in another thread that the left wing blogs were just mouthy and ineffective but that Obama and Axelrod are working to invent something big. They are pros and cover their tracks well. I figured it would take about this long to get it done.
Drudge has updated the caption with a photo of a beaming Sarah, Todd and Trig. No details yet.
What the hell is this about?