Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hecht

She analyzed his body language in the interview with O’Reilly and said, “This is really good, Bill, here he is trying to draw you closer to him” and later, “Here he just wants you to understand the point he is trying to make.” (not verbatim, but close.) And she described it, as if she was talking about a sweet little child. (I was waiting for the Awwwww.)

Earlier, she said that Sarah Palin (whom she admitted, she had never seen speak before) comes across as arrogant. Later in the conversation (after she reiterated “arrogant” for BOR), she pronounced Palin’s smile was “smug”.)

I am sure this clip would only get hearts and flowers from her.


850 posted on 09/07/2008 12:28:33 PM PDT by Shelayne (You'd have me down, down, down, down, down on my knees,,,.Won't you, Sarahcuda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: Shelayne
I actually sent OReilly a letter about that segment. Tanya was reviewing the clip of McCain announcing Sarah as his running mate and they were discussing McCain's body language. She was talking about his 'fig leaf' stance with his hands clasped together in front of him. Both she and OReilly commented that he really should clasp them behind his back.

I wrote asking him if it ever occurred to either of them that mabye he CAN'T clasp his hands behind him (or that it would be an uncomfortable position) because of his injuries while a POW. I can't believe neither one of them thought of that.

860 posted on 09/07/2008 12:35:02 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson