I take extreme exception to that....I argued on FR just recently that, as an adult campaigning on the trail for her parents, Chelsea should be fair game for questions. I was raked over the coals for it. The people on this forum and conservatives in general have veen very consistent in their message to a fault on this.
Go back 10 or 12 yrs.
So do you think that if Chelsea Clinton had gotten pregnant as an unmarried teenager, Freepers would be defending her?
Chelsea Clinton at 26-27, actively campaigning for her mom, answering questions on behalf of mom, stumping for her mom, defending her mom,
is not at all the same as a 17 year old daughter who is NOT campaigning, just being INTRODUCED as a daughter, of a candidate who is turned into a media event because of a private embarassing incident in her life.
You are right, no one should make the claim they are the same, or rip on you for this. You were not hypocritical. You accurately understood the difference.