I have to admit to being surprised by one thing. Like others on this forum, I believed that democrats only wanted to hear from liberal woman. They had a particular hatred for conservative females. But today I logged on to hillaryclintonforum.net and was shocked to see how many love, yes I said love, Sarah Palin. Admittedly many are driven by their animosity toward “the One.” I’ll probably get flamed for saying this, but it shows a level of openmindedness I didn’t expect from a democrat(not all but at least by these particular Hillary supporters.)
If Hillary was smart she would do the talk shows and defend Sarah from a womans perspective, it would greatly help her chances of being nominated in the future. Maybe it will be an awakening for her. It could happen.
Here's the divergence between the PUMAs and the faux-feminists that support Obama: The PUMAs, like them or not, are sticking to the storyline of being feminists who support women. The Gloria Steinems and the Margaret Carlsons and the Katie Courics and the Joy Behars of the world - they're interest is strictly POWER, based on their secular atheistic beliefs. And they've simply chosen the cause of "women" to be their bandwagon on which to ride because, let's face it, the probability grows greater and greater with each election that the "glass ceiling" will be shattered.
These women aren't pioneers - they're odds-players! If a woman can't get them the power THEY want, that woman is of no use - worse - a mortal enemy of their sick and twisted perspective. They would rather let one of their own - Hillary - go down in flames, than go down with her. They have no spine, no character, no conviction. They stand for nothing but unlimited gorging on the naivete of their true believers, and they're going to choke on it every election cycle in dismay until every one of them is in a retirement home somewhere, waxing regretful on the choices they've made.