If I were in a safe republican district (you know the kind that has no democrat challengers) and my republican representative were pro-abortion, I would strongly consider switching parties and running against him as a pro-life democrat.
Issues of taxes, spending, illegal immigration, and other domestic issues all pale in comparison to the issue of the genocide of our posterity. 50 million Americans cut off in the womb. That is the equivalent of everyone who died in WWII on all sides. That is what we have done to our posterity.
The Constitution guarantees the blessings of liberty to ourselves AND OUR POSTERITY, and yet we have willy nilly aborted our posterity and sacrificed our children on the altar of economic prosperity.
I believe that the districts which have no dem candidates and pro-choice GOP incumbents are extremely rare. Nearly all anti-life Republicans are in the northeast, midwest, and the west coast, and not many in those areas have no democrats running.
And that is the part of the Constitution that establishes the PURPOSE of the Constitution. Therefore, no interpretation of the Constitution can be accurate if it contradicts the purpose statement. "We the people of the United States, IN ORDER TO..."
In order to = purpose statement.
How in the world did the Scotus EVER get away with ignoring the actual text of the Constitution that insists that these blessings belong ALSO to the POSTERITY (the yet to be born) of the United States?
How? They LIED! Any justice who claims the argument of "precedence" overcomes the actual text is a justice who should be impeached for bad behavior.