[maggief]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122050082519598401.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

“The speech was well-written and well-delivered, but the problem is this is someone we know very little about, and the speech did not seriously expand our range of knowledge,” said presidential historian Michael Beschloss. “It makes it all the more important that she submit to interviews by journalists in the weeks to come in an atmosphere that is not pre-scripted.”

http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2008/09/hotline_after_d_441.html

Presidential historian Michael Beschloss: “The speech was fine, well-delivered, loved in the hall. But this is a woman that Americans know extremely little about, especially for a national nominee. And this speech didn’t tell us really very much beyond what we knew already, and that’s going to make it even more important in the future when she gives speeches that are more impromptu and when she submits to interrogations by reporters and average American citizens” (”NewsHour,” PBS, 9/3).

[HIDEK6]

“It makes it all the more important that she submit to interviews by journalists in the weeks to come in an atmosphere that is not pre-scripted.”

Submit?

Will Hussein have to submit also?

[HIDEK6]

“It makes it all the more important that she submit to interviews by journalists in the weeks to come in an atmosphere that is not pre-scripted.”

Submit?

Will Hussein have to submit also?