[TINS]

You do know that by this definition of “abortion”, the female body naturally kills tens of thousands of “babies” all by itself?

Opposing the existence or use of birth control isn’t “conservative” or “right” in either sense of the word.

Besides, have you checked out the poll numbers on outlawing basic contraception? You’d have an easier time legalizing herion in this country than outlawing contraceptives. It just ain’t gonna happen.

If you hold the line on contraceptives out of “principle”, you’ll just continue to make conservatives look like crazies who want to control sex, and we’ll keep losing the abortion debate. The millions of *real* dead aborted babies—you know, the ones with more than 100 cells—will surely thank you for your principled stand.

[Petronski]

You do know that by this definition of “abortion”, the female body naturally kills tens of thousands of “babies” all by itself?

Which female body has tens of thousands of fertilized eggs?

If your bizarre claim is true (!), it is something happens naturally, and is not intentionally induced by human action.

You’d have an easier time legalizing herion in this country than outlawing contraceptives.

Who said anything about outlawing contraceptives?

The millions of *real* dead aborted babies—you know, the ones with more than 100 cells—will surely thank you for your principled stand.

So, 100 cells means not human, but 101 means human?

Say whatever you want to salve your conscience, but abortifacients kill human beings.

[Petronski]

Opposing the existence or use of birth control isn’t “conservative” or “right” in either sense of the word.

Opposing the killing of the unborn, for convenience, is both conservative and right, even if the unborn has but one cell.

[big'ol_freeper]

have you checked out the poll numbers on outlawing basic contraception?

Huh, let's see what G.K. Chesterton would have to say about that:

"Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions." - ILN, 4/19/30