Replies

Oh, and by the way, while you were busy attacking me, calling me names, and making false allegations about me, you failed to answer any of the questions I had for you in post 1110.

So, let's repeat them, shall we?

Do you favor amnesty for tens of millions of illegals?
Do you favor giving up a portion of your paycheck to bail out executives with multi-million dollar salaries at Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General Motors, and other private enterprises?
Do you believe that your children should pay for the trillions of dollars in current U.S. liabilities, including off-balance sheet items?
And do you believe in "living wages" or implementing mandatory energy rationing (carbon cap-and-trade)?
What about subjugating ourself to the United Nations? or the World Court?

Your only response was: "Ass for your immigration bait, not taking it since it isn't as devisive as you'd like."

That's funny; not all of my questions related to immigration.

Your direct failure to answer them, while simultaneously needlessly and maliciously harassing me about my conservative credentials, is very telling.

Your silence is extremely telling, buster!

So, let's try this: if you think you're so conservative, I dare you to answer those questions. And if the silence continues, I may very well be tempted to assume that you're just nothing more than another whining, cowardly Bushbot with the attitude that "I'm right, you're wrong, screw logic and facts, because I'm right, and you're wrong!"

To repeat your words, verbatim: "Come on mr conservative, lets talk issues."

So, come on, bray, let's talk issues! And by that, it's gonna be a two-way street in which you answer questions too.

...you failed to answer any of the questions I had for you in post 1110.

Considering that I posted these questions at 1:46 pm, you replied to another post of mine at 1:59 pm, and you even went on to reply to other Freepers at 5:55 pm and 6:28 pm, I'm going to conclude that you have neither the courage nor the ability to truthfully answer simple yes-and-no questions.

You have no problem making false allegations and openly libeling me, yet you are too scared to answer simple yes-and-no questions.

Your continued silence is beyond telling. It speaks volumes.

And, given your profile, which includes such choice gems of phrases as "George Bush is a visionary that sees the World as it can be, not as it is" and "As this Wildfire spreads throughout the World, despots cower in fear as they wait for their ultimate demise at the hands of God’s servant leader, the Freedom President George W Bush."

I just want to remind you that the purpose of the United States Government is not to conduct social engineering experiments—here or abroad—and the sorts of things that you advocate, despite the fact that they may have good outcomes, do not justify the means (e.g. ignoring the Constitution, unprovoked wars, and permanent occupations of other countries).

The purpose of the United States Government is to protect the citizen's right to life, liberty, and property; to provide for a common defense (not offense) against foreign and domestic enemies; to resolve disputes between the States and citizens thereof; to regulate money; and to maintain a set of standards of weights and measures.

All of these responsibilities are explicitly delineated in the Constitution, which curiously does not all contain a provision for ensuring democracy in other countries (though it does contain a clause in which "a republican form of government" is guaranteed for each state, something that Juan McCain's amnesty bill would completely quash).

But hey, McCain's amnesty makes life easier for some of "God's children"...so it must be good, right?