1) They claim that Sarah Palin wasn't the mother of the down syndrome baby, and that it was really her daughter's. However, there are a couple of problems with this. First, the chance of a teenager giving birth to a Downs baby is 1250 to 1. The chances of a 40+ year old woman giving birht to a Downs baby is 20 to 1. While most of the pictures of Sarah Palin in the last few months are not profile shots, there's one picture (where she's surrounded by cameras) that makes her sure look pregnant to me. See This. The teenager (Bristol) apparently had mono and so was out of school for several months. 3) In a small Alaskan town, you'd think that someone would have spoken that it wasn't Sarah that gave birth. She gave birth at a hospital. 4) It seems like a very complex plot to hide a teen pregnancy. If a sitting governor could pull this off, she shouldn't be Veep: she should be head of the CIA.
The other thing that lefty blogs are pushing is that Sarah was already pregnant when she got married. She got married on August 29, 1988. Her son (Track) was born April 20, 1989. So 8 months later. However, in 1989, pregnancy tests were not that accurate. So if she were pregnant at her wedding, there would have been a good chance she wouldn't have known. It's also possible, of course, that Track was born a bit premature (5 weeks or so: not unheard of. And Trig was born about 4 to 5 weeks early in 2008).
Are the libs truly counting months between marriage and birth? Isn’t that quaint of them, just precious. Why you’d almost think they disapproved of premarital sex.......
this is just wrong, it isn’t the liberals we know and (don’t) love, they believe living together is the way to go and who cares about sex outside of marriage, not them. And if a child should result abortion is the thing to do. Well perhaps they have discovered their morality too late because no one will view them as anything other than the true hypocrites they are.
You're kidding, right? This is one of their big gotchas? It's heartwarming to see how moralistic they've suddenly become.
OK that makes her evil, right there.../sarc
The are really clutching at straws, you know.
I've been arguing with a guy on his MySpace blog, too, about it. His big argument is "she has no experience". He's all for the experienced and very corrupt, Marxist, soros' sock-puppet, "civil rights activist" and attorney like the very jr. senator obaMA.
It’s really none of their damned business! I thought this was the party of ‘stay out of our bedroom’!
What a bunch of HYPOCRITES!
Kind of prudish for them to be saying that, don't you think?
Here in Pennsyltucky, where we cling to our guns and religion, I’ve often heard the old chestnut:
The first child in a marriage can come at any time. All the rest will take approximately 9 months.
This is the funniest thing yet. The old biddy liberals counting on their fingers how many months passed between the wedding and the first born’s birth! And then passing judgement.
Isn’t this a hoot? I can hardly stop laughing about it. These are the folks who think religious people are intolerant and rigid.
