Of course, there’s absolutely no actual evidence for any of this, but don’t let that stop you.
***As was stated before to the other troll operating on this thread, if there were “absolutely no actual evidence for any of this” then Berg vs. Obama would have been dismissed as trivial by now. But it hasn’t. Because there are enough facts within that case to warrant looking into it. But don’t let that stop you and your troll buddies.
You don't understand how civil procedure works. Berg has filed a suit and requested a TRO, but the other party in the suit has not yet had a chance to respond. A judge can't dismiss a case until the other parties have had a chance to appear in court. Our legal system is party-diven. That means that until one of the parties makes a motion to dismiss a case, it would be legally improper for a judge to do so.
Once Obama's $500/hour lawyers show up in court and file their motion to dismiss, that's when the judge will toss this case out.