I will, BTW, as will you. But do you at least understand why I believe the Bible, even if you don't. Do you understand the points above (first 5)? Have you even considered their veracity? Can you so easily surmise my idiocy and you superiority? Do I offend you so much thatyou either discount or refuse to consider the claims of this 'Jesus'? Who do you say he was?
Our other debates are fun, but relatively meaningless in comparison to the nature of Jesus.
Jesus claimed to be God. Therefor, he is either:
1. a Lunatic
2. a Liar
3. Just who he claimed.
What say you?
Jesus claimed to be God.
***Yes, Jesus did claim that. And the science behind the historicity of this event is often attacked by the same people who claim to uphold science on crevo threads. This is a new form of a religion, based upon scientism.
Here’s a thread I opened a while ago in support of the science behind the historicity of Jesus:
The Historicity of Jesus Christ [Open Thread under Religion Moderator’s Guidelines]
History | August 3, 2008 | Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2056400/posts