To: GourmetDan
My objection is that you cannot provide a mechanism that clearly explains the motion through the coordinate system.
Gravity provides that mechanism provided one allows the tiny Earth to orbit the massive Sun, which is something you have a philosophical objection to.
You cannot provide a mechanism or cite a Biblical passage to support your model. Too embarrassed? No problem. I would be to.
311 posted on
08/29/2008 6:45:47 AM PDT by
allmendream
(If "the New Yorker" makes a joke, and liberals don't get it, is it still funny?)
To: allmendream
Gravity provides that mechanism provided one allows the tiny Earth to orbit the massive Sun, which is something you have a philosophical objection to.Just to be adversarial, how do you know the sun is massive (e.g. in mass, not volume)? Is it not based on a series of suppositions, including heliocentrism?
To: allmendream
"My objection is that you cannot provide a mechanism that clearly explains the motion through the coordinate system. Gravity provides that mechanism provided one allows the tiny Earth to orbit the massive Sun, which is something you have a philosophical objection to." Oh, the mechanism has been provided, if you knew how to understand the model. I even explained your error, but it does no good. Every experiment designed to detect the motion of the earth around the sun has failed.
331 posted on
08/29/2008 12:43:14 PM PDT by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson