If it wasn't his opinion, what was it? A fact?
"He said you had answered my every inquiry while that is simply not the case, you have studiously avoided answering my two main questions repeatedly."
Apparently he thought I did answer your inquiries adequately. It's clear that you'll continue to make your claim no matter what explanation or information I give you. That's a classic evo tactic in 'discussions'.
I suppose what is surprising is that you really believe that no one can see through it. Apparently there's at least one.
What explanation or information have you ‘given me’ on either of my two lines of inquiry?
What Biblical passage supports Geocentricism?
What force could drag the Sun around the Moon?
Why are you so afraid to answer these simple questions if you are so sure of the superiority of your Geocentric model?