Replies

"Only if they insisted that the Easter Bunny was a Scientifically valid hypothesis and superior to the “chicken egg colored by children” theory would I ridicule them."

There's as much scientific evidence for the Easter Bunny as there is for abiogenesis.

Is abiogenesis 'scientifically invalid'?

262 posted on 08/27/2008 11:29:55 AM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)

Scientific evidence for the Easter Bunny? You obviously don't know what Scientific evidence entails.

The capability of RNA to autocatalize is Scientific evidence in support of the hypothetical involvement of RNA in abiogenesis.

The ability of the early earth atmosphere to spontaneously form biological molecules is another piece of evidence is support of they hypothesis of abiogenesis.

What “Scientific evidence” do you have to support the ‘Easter Bunny’ hypothesis over the theory of “chicken eggs colored by children”?

264 posted on 08/27/2008 11:38:34 AM PDT by allmendream (If "the New Yorker" makes a joke, and liberals don't get it, is it still funny?)