[SengirV]

I changed from 200 to 50 years to maximize the significant digits in the values. We can go back to 200 years if you like, then you’ll show a faster value someone came up with and ignore a slower value that I find.

If you are going to compare a Type II supernova to Type 1A supernova, then we can stop here. It’s pointless to continue because you refuse to answer.

You say horizon, I say inflation
You say problem, I say theory
horizon, inflation, problem, theory
lets call the whole thing off.

[GourmetDan]

"I changed from 200 to 50 years to maximize the significant digits in the values. We can go back to 200 years if you like, then you’ll show a faster value someone came up with and ignore a slower value that I find."

The problem with shortening the time period to 50 years is that time was measured atomically over most of that period, and you know what that does to the measurement.

"If you are going to compare a Type II supernova to Type 1A supernova, then we can stop here. It’s pointless to continue because you refuse to answer."

Uh, no. Type 1A supernova are identified by a specific light-curve. No specific light-curve, no Type 1A supernova. It's truth by definition.