[allmendream]

“I never said that geocentrism was MORE valid. As you, Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis note, it is EQUALLY valid (as a coordinate system). Geocentrism is EQUAL to ‘geokineticism’. EQUAL.” GDan (parenthetical comment my own)

Is this another departure from your previous stance? You used to go on about how “limited” Heliocentrists didn't account for the gravity of the entire galaxy and the outer planets but that the superior (and you think Biblical for some reason as yet unexplained) Geocentric model was not limited by this ‘blindness’.

Do I have to find all your previous posts extolling the virtue of Geocentricism to show that this is a new stance, or will you admit to it?

[GourmetDan]

"Heliocentrists didn't account for the gravity of the entire galaxy and the outer planets but that the superior (and you think Biblical for some reason as yet unexplained) Geocentric model was not limited by this ‘blindness’."

That's still a true statement. You don't.

More evidence that you don't understand what I'm telling you.