[allmendream]

Once again you come up with a big fat nothing. The men you mention say either is workable as a coordinate system, either is equally valid. None of them say that geocentricism is MORE valid. Moreover there is a mechanism (called Gravity) that easily explains how a small object would be caught in the orbit of a larger object; but you have yet to propose a mechanism that would be strong enough to drag the Sun around the Earth and yet somehow leave the Earth entirely untouched. Must be a “magical” force that exerts itself only upon non-Earth objects.

Jer. 5:21 “Hear ye, I pray you, this, O people, foolish and without heart, Eyes they have, and they see not, Ears they have, and they hear not.”

[GourmetDan]

"The men you mention say either is workable as a coordinate system, either is equally valid. None of them say that geocentricism is MORE valid."

Perhaps we have identified your mistake.

I never said that geocentrism was MORE valid. As you, Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis note, it is EQUALLY valid. Geocentrism is EQUAL to 'geokineticism'. EQUAL.

As I noted in my previous post, I have no reason to accept the pronouncements of men over the Word of God in this area and choose not to. You choose the opposite. That's fine w/ me.