Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
The point is, is that it shouldn't have an impact on the woman's right to choose.”

What shouldn't? The teaching of the Church? The actual beginning of life?

***

Catholism has never been for the feint of heart.

Even less going forward, it looks like.

They're gonna hate us for shining light into their darkness.

17 posted on 08/25/2008 2:31:37 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (when you're bot, you're pwn3d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the invisib1e hand
You've gotten right at the heart of her comments. In effect she is saying, "No matter if it is a life or not, my support for a woman's right to end it remains."

That is more horrifying than having her leave it at a mystery. Now she is admitting that she is fine with possibility of the destruction of life. Doesn't matter either way to her.

Obama is the same - he claims to have no idea when life begins. 50/50 chance that it is murder, but he'll support it anyway. Going a step further, he says, even if the aborted baby moves (he or she is alive) it is not worth saving.

Forget about 'No blood for oil' The Dems are willing to give the blood of infants for expediency and votes/power.

Maybe Rev Wright is right... G-D America if this stands. I would see no reason for Him to bless her.

42 posted on 08/25/2008 3:58:56 PM PDT by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson