The creation/ID argument is philosophy & religion, not science. However, as I understand it, C/ID says that things happened in the same way, but God caused it to happen that way. I don't see that there is necessarily a conflict.
==The creation/ID argument is philosophy & religion, not science.
So is Darwin’s ToE.
==However, as I understand it, C/ID says that things happened in the same way, but God caused it to happen that way. I don’t see that there is necessarily a conflict.
You understanding is based on a misunderstanding. Darwin’s ToE is based on the notion that ALL LIFE is the product of RANDOM MUTATION and NATURAL SELECTION. Both Creation and ID scientists maintain this is impossible. So how exactly does that constitute Creation and ID scientists agreeing that “things happened in the same way” as Darwin’s fairytale would have us believe?