Didn’t the courts find that the “Theory” proposed was cut and pasted from originally purely religious theory? Hnece the couret ruled it was just religion under another label?
Didn’t the courts find that the “Theory” proposed was cut and pasted from originally purely religious theory? Hnece the couret ruled it was just religion under another label?
It’s an on-going debate: while there may be some that are guilty, there’s simply no way an argument can be made that all these scientists are in this for strictly “religious” purposes.
www.dissentfromdarwin.org