[E=MC2]

From the article in the thread on this, it appears that the UofC is not allowing those courses simply because of a statement made in the front of the textbook. I saw nowhere that UofC’s decision was based on the textbook teaching the ToE wrong.

From antievolution.org:

"Christian high schools teaching antievolution as course content in biology classes are suing the California state university system."

[metmom]

Is the textbook teaching the ToE wrong?

Is it’s teaching of it in error?

If it’s not, there’s simply no reason to not accept the credits. If they are not accepting the credits because they don’t like the stand the book takes as opposed to the book being in error, then it’s a matter or religious persecution.

I don’t blame them for suing then.