I’m not a biology teacher, but I do know that tenth graders are not likely to get more than a few weeks discussion of evolution. They aren’t likely to come away with anything more than a few buzzwords.
What this article says, for those who take the trouble to read it, is that kids bring a knowledge of creationism to class. The controversy is already in the air. The challenge is to teach the science side of the controversy.
The article was what sparked my concerns. Asking students what they see is fine, but I think (hope) we agree that the combination of visuals plus buzzwords needs further strengthening. More time in the curriculum would help.
What this article says, for those who take the trouble to read it, is that kids bring a knowledge of creationism to class. The controversy is already in the air. The challenge is to teach the science side of the controversy.
But sadly, what they get is that science is at odds with everything else in their world. There’s just no room for God in science....if anyone says there is, they get censored or sued or both!
So say the godless liberals who have consistently proven that they are unobjective:
journalism (drive-by media)
politics (hyopocrat party where Pelosi says abortion is just cool with the Catholic church!)
law (activist judges off their rockers in places like SF)
eudcation in general (FAILED public school systems across the board)
science specifically (homosexuality/transexuality/pedophilia is normal & ramming the godless agenda down normal people’s throats...hot air cult junk science, etc. etc. etc.)
Godless liberalism is destructive and need not be coddled and should be defeated by a moral nation/society.