Wrong. A beginning biology course is to teach what biologists think.
Once students learn that, they may go on to oppose it if they so choose.
You want them to learn what biologists don’t think, which is silly.
Are you saying that there aren’t biologists who challenge Darwin’s ToE? Tell me, should students learn both sides of the global warming debate? After all, climate scientists believe it’s caused by humans.
Are you saying that there aren’t biologists who challenge Darwin’s ToE? Tell me, should students learn both sides of the global warming debate? After all, “real” climate scientists believe it’s caused by humans.
first teach calculus, then physics, then chemistry and then finally biology and students will realize that most biologists don’t think, period.
Don’t bother answering. You are obviously a Temple of Darwin devotee who is willing to use force to prevent Darwin’s fairytale from having to stand on its own two feet. You are the reason why the time for debate has ended.
Preposterous. Science is about fact, not what a biologist "thinks". Anything of the sort is conjecture.
You want them to learn what biologists don’t think, which is silly.
Incorrect. Remove the suposition that evolution is the only theory and proceed with fact. Verifiable fact.
Is this a new tune from kids are supposed to learn science in science class?
Which biologists, BTW? The ones that get canned for not toeing the hardline evo view? The ones whose careers are over when they question the ToE?
dissentfromdarwin.org