Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wilco200

The Democrats have tried to float the excuse that Obama was more concerned with the legal nuances of Roe vs. Wade. But Obama clearly does not have the legal acumen (surprising for a Harvard Law grad). Yes, he was editor of the Harvard Law Review, yet he never wrote an article. After graduation, he joined some two-bit law firm and represented the slum lord Tony Rezko. Then, he becomes a “community organizer.” Not your typical path for a Harvard Law grad. It seems like a waste of law school tuition, but I wonder if he paid tuition or was he there on some sort of free ride.


24 posted on 08/22/2008 7:56:06 AM PDT by Raster Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Raster Man
Actually, just today reporters from the Politico found Obama’s only law review article, which was anonymous, but the campaign has confirmed it was by Obama.

Strangely enough, the article is about whether unborn children can sue their parents for negligence. This is clearly an issue Obama was interest in since law school.

It also makes his “punished with a baby” comment more understandable.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2066041/posts

50 posted on 08/22/2008 2:38:14 PM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson