To: Owen
From Day One, people . . . from the first day of this overall campaign there was not going to be a conservative agenda. There could not be because the Dems are going to control Congress. There can be no conservative agenda with a liberal Congress. The president’s role in 2009 is to dilute the left’s agenda. That’s the best you can do this year, and to do that at all you have to win. So - which does a better job of "diluting" the left's agenda?
A) Elect a moderate/centrist/capitulating President and somewhat liberal VP
B) Electing in the most conservative POTUS and VP that you can
?
114 posted on
08/21/2008 9:13:16 PM PDT by
TheBattman
(Vote your conscience, or don't complain about RINOs!)
To: TheBattman
Quit your bawling and leave the party then. Please!
To: TheBattman
The most effective choice is the moderate centrist, because he or she can get elected.
The extremists won’t — and if Obama loses, THAT will be why. Hillary was right.
123 posted on
08/21/2008 9:16:05 PM PDT by
Owen
To: TheBattman
Choice B is unavailable at this time, unfortunately.
We get either choice A, or door #3, a dangerous radical Marxist buffoon.
This is the least palatable election choice of my lifetime (since 1984, when I’ve been old enough to vote.)
177 posted on
08/21/2008 9:35:49 PM PDT by
Cymbaline
(I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stres)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson