Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LeGrande

“The women and children were taken away because of what they were taught.”

With the exception of two females who were improperly classified as minors, the women were not ‘taken away’.

And yes, the CPS argued that it was a ‘system of belief’ which contributed to the ‘dangerous environment’ that the children were in.

Now, the indictments are another matter, and are for actual ‘acts’.

You keep mixing the two, and that is a big mistake.


I must say, you being an atheist, that your defense of the FLDS based on religious rights, is admirable.


90 posted on 08/22/2008 9:58:51 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Why is everybody always pickin' on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
With the exception of two females who were improperly classified as minors, the women were not ‘taken away’.

The women produced documentation proving that they were not minors. The appeals court so stated. That is not just 'improperly classified'.

And yes, the CPS argued that it was a ‘system of belief’ which contributed to the ‘dangerous environment’ that the children were in.

That is scary, scary, scary to me. Luckily the appeals court rejected that argument.

Now, the indictments are another matter, and are for actual ‘acts’.

You keep mixing the two, and that is a big mistake.

When have I ever mixed the two, or said that the perps shouldn't be arrested and tried? Maybe you should try and think a little before posting?

99 posted on 08/22/2008 10:18:12 AM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson