Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie

“Belts are required ONLY on Public Roads.”

I was thinking the same thing.

However, it does give credence to the thought that when it comes to being ON the FLDS property, rules are discarded, even if they would protect the lives of children.


37 posted on 08/22/2008 8:06:31 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Why is everybody always pickin' on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
However, it does give credence to the thought that when it comes to being ON the FLDS property, rules are discarded, even if they would protect the lives of children.

They discard all other kinds of laws that would protect children, like those against statutory rape. Why should anyone expect them to stop at seat belt laws?

53 posted on 08/22/2008 8:42:28 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson