Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flo Nightengale
BMI measurements (based solely on weight/height) are poor indicators of health. BMI doesn't take into consideration fat/muscle, etc.

True, but the BMI is a simple number to get. And according to the article someone who is 5.6 and weighs 220 has a BMI of 30. So a BMI of 35 is way up there.

19 posted on 08/21/2008 7:09:26 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

Simple or not, BMI just isn’t very accurate. And what’s the point of using such a measurement?

Since muscle is more dense than fat, many physically fit people are mistakenly classified as “overweight”, while they are actually less likely to die young than a “normal” weight individual whose excess weight is mostly fat.


21 posted on 08/21/2008 7:25:06 PM PDT by Flo Nightengale (Keep sweet? I'll show you sweet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson