Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
There’s only two possibilities, life arose through blind chance processes, or life was designed. The evidence for and against both perspectives should be presented.

It's not possible that the Universe was designed so that under the right circumstances, life could arise and appear to be a result of random processes?

79 posted on 08/18/2008 12:27:11 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
It's not possible that the Universe was designed so that under the right circumstances, life could arise and appear to be a result of random processes?

The most amazing thing is that the supposed designer made things look exactly as if they had arisen through evolution. No human engineer could make an interconnected system look more like it has arisen through small incremental steps.

Oddly enough, human engineers don't try. Human genetic engineers make things that don't fit a nested hierarchy. So the only actual samples of designed life where we are certain of the designer's identity and methods don't fit the evolution paradigm. The M.O. is wrong.

81 posted on 08/18/2008 12:34:43 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

==It’s not possible that the Universe was designed so that under the right circumstances, life could arise and appear to be a result of random processes?

If you insist on that possibility being covered, no problem. Since there would be no evidence for it one way or the other, it would take but a few seconds to mention it and move on.


82 posted on 08/18/2008 12:37:21 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson