Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
It is the Cre-tarded “cdesign proponentists” who are blasphemous and unscientific.

Evolution through natural selection of genetic variation is Scientific and has nothing to do with blasphemy as it doesn't mention God to blaspheme HIM; while I.D. posits that God is a rank amateur and incompetent who cannot design life that is capable of adaptation without direct divine intervention.

621 posted on 08/21/2008 9:56:03 AM PDT by allmendream (If "the New Yorker" makes a joke, and liberals don't get it, is it still funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
==Evolution through natural selection of genetic variation is Scientific and has nothing to do with blasphemy as it doesn't mention God to blaspheme HIM

Actually, Darwin's ToE is blasphemous to the core because it assumes that adaptation and “evolution” are random to the core. They maintain that the designs we see in nature are an illusion and are really just the product of blind, random chance. This is the HEIGHT OF BLASPHEMY. It's sad to see people who identify with Christianity like you come along and make excuses for them.

On the other hand, Creation Scientists (and to a much lesser extent, IDers) give God the credit for the designs we see in nature, and look for ways to see God's design in areas that are still poorly understood. So not only are they not blasphemous, they give all the glory to God, and are filled with wonder (and praise) every time they discover another one of God's ingenious designs.

I'll take Creation over evolution any day.

626 posted on 08/21/2008 10:14:49 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson