How can you claim to respect original intent and then ignore the obvious intent of the writer of the Amendment, the intent of the writer of the Virginia law the Amendment was based upon, and the intent of the founder who insisted that there BE a Bill of Rights?
And you still have not answered my questions about God and dice, after claiming I never asked it in the first place. I have now asked it of you twice. Why no answer?
You also cannot tell me how you propose that epigenetic mechanisms can derive genetic variation rather than phenotypic variation. It seems your source confirmed that genetic variation is due to mutation and that epigenetics changes phenotype. Can you address this discrepancy between what you claim and what your source said?
==How about their opinion on the 1st Amendment, which is BASED upon the Virginia law?
See previous reply.
==How is discounting their voluminous writings on the principle of Church and State respecting their original intent?
See previous reply. Etc, etc, etc.
==And you still have not answered my questions about God and dice, after claiming I never asked it in the first place. I have now asked it of you twice. Why no answer?
Dice can be both God’s will and random to our frame of reference in the same way God can know the beginning from the end and yet at the same time grant us free will.
==You also cannot tell me how you propose that epigenetic mechanisms can derive genetic variation rather than phenotypic variation. It seems your source confirmed that genetic variation is due to mutation and that epigenetics changes phenotype. Can you address this discrepancy between what you claim and what your source said?
==It seems your source confirmed that genetic variation is due to mutation and that epigenetics changes phenotype.
Do you concede that the Darwinists are now admitting that they were wrong about random mutation producing phenotype changes?
==You also cannot tell me how you propose that epigenetic mechanisms can derive genetic variation rather than phenotypic variation...Can you address this discrepancy between what you claim and what your source said?
How about the following:
“It is hypothesized that the generation of mutations in the error-prone replications of the epigenetically reprogrammed cells is not random. The mutations match epigenetic alterations in the cellular genome, namely gain of function mutations in the case of hypomethylation and loss of functions in the case of hypermethylation. In addition, continuing proliferation of the cells imposed by signaling in SSE speeds up the natural selection of the mutant cells favoring the survival of the cells with mutations that are beneficial in the environment. In this way, a stress-induced replication of the cells epigenetically reprograms their genome for quick adaptation to stressful environments providing an increased rate of mutations, epigenetic tags to beneficial mutations and quick selection process. In combination, these processes drive the origin of the transformed mammalian cells, cancer development and progression. Support from genomic, biochemical and medical studies for the proposed hypothesis, and its implementations are discussed.”
http://carcin.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/8/1323
Now I’m curious.
When you change the oil in your car, do you go to a library and study oil changing?
Americans understand that NO SINGLE document gives us ultimate freedom, but that God does.
We also understand that godless liberals do not define science, they don’t exclusively make rules for the rest of us to follow and as we NOW know they and the ACLU don’t have exclusive access to ALL the documents or laws that define and govern America.