To: stormer; MrB
Hmmm... I've lived in a place that received around 500 inches of snow per year. If that snow did not melt (it did where I lived, thankfully) and if compressed to 10 percent of its original depth to account for lost interstitial volume, we arrive at an ice depth of around 4 feet. At four feet of accumulation per year for the intervening 60 or so years, the resulting figure is quite close to the 250 feet you've mentioned. I guess I've missed your point. You've missed the point alright. Show us where Greenland gets 500" of snow a year, especially at the exact spot where the planes landed.
Then perhaps, you could explain why they traveled a mile from their original location.
230 posted on
08/18/2008 6:53:14 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
Then perhaps, you could explain why they traveled a mile from their original location. See Glacial Movement.
244 posted on
08/18/2008 7:24:31 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: metmom
I doubt that snowfall accumulation data from the crash site is available. What I was pointing out was that accumulation of ice is not startling. For material upon or within a glacier to move is also not remarkable; glacial flow can be many miles per year.
252 posted on
08/18/2008 8:02:57 PM PDT by
stormer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson