Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: valkyry1

I remember post 197. That’s why I asked if you had a point.

No one suggested that Coyote’s list was “scientific.” It was provided as an exhaustive list of the possible ways for life to start.

Do you want to add to the list?


213 posted on 08/18/2008 5:36:39 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

//No one suggested that Coyote’s list was “scientific.” It was provided as an exhaustive list of the possible ways for life to start.//

Do you agree with Coyote’s list? Are those valid hypothesis to you?


220 posted on 08/18/2008 6:16:19 PM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

To: js1138; valkyry1
No one suggested that Coyote’s list was “scientific.” It was provided as an exhaustive list of the possible ways for life to start.

So what is the scientific alternative then? What's the scientific theory concerning abiogenesis?

237 posted on 08/18/2008 7:03:33 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
Does Sky Daddy breathed on a clump of dirt fall under:

d) A divine agent of unspecified nature zap-poofed the first life forms into existence.
?

320 posted on 08/19/2008 12:02:45 AM PDT by dread78645 (Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson