I remember post 197. That’s why I asked if you had a point.
No one suggested that Coyote’s list was “scientific.” It was provided as an exhaustive list of the possible ways for life to start.
Do you want to add to the list?
//No one suggested that Coyotes list was scientific. It was provided as an exhaustive list of the possible ways for life to start.//
Do you agree with Coyotes list? Are those valid hypothesis to you?
So what is the scientific alternative then? What's the scientific theory concerning abiogenesis?
d) A divine agent of unspecified nature zap-poofed the first life forms into existence.
?